Logoff on Login

[hkwz196z]

Hi
I am getting logged off on Login ,

ICH70001I HKWZ196 LAST ACCESS AT 04:08:40 ON SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2012
HKWZ196 LOGON IN PROGRESS AT 04:09:38 ON NOVEMBER 3, 2012
NO BROADCAST MESSAGES
HKWZ196 LOGGED OFF TSO AT 04:09:38 ON NOVEMBER 3, 2012
******


pl. advice

regards

[prino]

Did you read Rules for using z/OS - work in progress, return frequently!?

Given what you were doing, the answer is a very resounding No, and that's why you were banned, plain and simple.

[hkwz196z]

Hi

I had a simple Assembler program with WTO with ROUTCDE=11,DESC=7 and may be it got into some loop , needed to analyze , before that only
LOGIN problem came up
regards

[prino]

Rule number 6 clearly states:

6. When you submit a job, check that

• it isn't looping - if it is taking more than a few minutes, cancel it!
• it isn't waiting for data sets - if it is, get out of those data sets, do not submit umpteen more copies of the same job
• it doesn't produce excessive amounts of output - if it does, cancel it!
• always purge the output of jobs that ended in a S722 abend!

Your job had been running for 4 minutes prior to it being cancelled by me, and in that time it had produced 42,000+ WTO's.

If you're to dumb to figure out that an assembler program of a few lines should not run for more than a few milliseconds, producing only a few lines of output, you do not have any business accessing FanDeZhi.

[hkwz196z]

Hi
Thank you for your reply , I did try to cancel the job , but somehow , terminal was showing busy , and on disconnect , i could not login

i will try to see next time onwards such loops do not happen , and cancel job timely
currently my login gets logged off

regards

[steve-myers]

I don't know what kind of Assembler training encourages a beginner to use WTO for debugging. In the real world, using WTO for anything is not encouraged.

There are other reasons why WTO is a bad choice. It is difficult for a beginner to insert data into the message, and this data can be important for debugging.

I've been writing Assembler for more than 40 years, and I rarely use WTO.

I doubt the admins will reverse their decision.

[tsubluh]

Steve is it that you use SVC 35 then

[steve-myers]

No, I just rarely use WTO. I do use WTO MF=(E,msg), which usually amounts to an SVC 35. This amounts to using my message generator to construct the message, and then I add MCSTYPE and the descriptor and route data manually before the WTO.